Is Distributed Connectionism Compatible with the Physical Symbol System Hypothesis?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Proper Treatment of Symbols in a Connectionist Architecture
A foundational principle of modern cognitive science is the Physical Symbol System hypothesis, which states simply that human cognition is the product of a physical symbol system (PSS). A symbol is a pattern that denotes something else; a symbol system is a set of symbols that can be composed into more complex structures by a set of relations. The term " physical " conveys that a symbol system ...
متن کاملAn Online Q-learning Based Multi-Agent LFC for a Multi-Area Multi-Source Power System Including Distributed Energy Resources
This paper presents an online two-stage Q-learning based multi-agent (MA) controller for load frequency control (LFC) in an interconnected multi-area multi-source power system integrated with distributed energy resources (DERs). The proposed control strategy consists of two stages. The first stage is employed a PID controller which its parameters are designed using sine cosine optimization (SCO...
متن کاملReconstructing Physical Symbol Systems
In attempting to force ALVINN’ into their already bulging symbolist tent, Vera and Simon (1993a, 1993b, 1993c) have burst the seams of the physical symbol system hypothesis (PSSH; Newell, 1980a; Newell & Simon, 1976). We would like to present another view of representation in connectionist networks and respond to statements about ALVINN by both Vera and Simon and Green0 and Moore (1993). In so ...
متن کاملThe cognitive dynamics of distributed language
Until the 1990s cognitive science relied on comparing human cognition to how everyday computers process information. However, with the advent of connectionism, neuroscience and robotics, symbol processing fell out of favour. Physical symbol systems are now rarely seen as appropriate models for brains or minds (MacDorman, 2007). Extending the critique of symbolic models to language, David Spurre...
متن کاملIs connectionism compatible with rationalism?
The main aim of this paper is to explore three connectionist stances on innateness. The argument is that connectionists can be nativists without necessarily being, for want of a better term, `symbolic nativists'. Also, connectionist versions of the innateness hypothesis can be just as strong in their commitment to nativism as symbolic versions. In addition, it will be claimed that these three c...
متن کامل